Below are some discussion questions to help you get started on your blog post on the David Lloyd. Do NOT feel obligated to use these questions for your posts! They are merely here to inspire you and to help you get started.
Also, bear in mind that I am aware of the challenging nature of this essay. David Lloyd has truly become a “rock star” in the field of Irish Studies, and this particular essay has become seminal in any earnest discussion of the Irish novel. Yet, there’s no denying that this essay poses difficulties for even the most seasoned of readers (including your instructor!). Take your time, take notes, and don’t get too bogged down with some of the more complex concepts and jargon. Remember that it’s best to make a concerted effort to understand particular parts of the essay than to try to understand “the whole thing.” If you walk away understanding one or two key paragraphs from this essay I will consider that no meager feat.
Discussion Questions
- In this essay David Lloyd explores the age-old stereotype of the Irish as “violent.” Where does that stereotype come from? Who defines what constitutes “violence”? What does Lloyd imply about how the novel helped to perpetuate this stereotype?
- Lloyd borrows extensively from Gramsci’s concept of the “subaltern.” What constitutes a subaltern and a subaltern group? How is subaltern history different from “dominant” history? On page 127, Lloyd suggests that subaltern history “can be read as the sign of another mode of narrative.” What is that mode, according to Lloyd? Given that the Irish history is in many ways the history of subaltern groups, how might this history affect the nature of the Irish novel?
- On page 129, Lloyd briefly questions the nature of “classification” systems in terms of what constitutes “major” or “minor” literature. In your opinion, where does this classification system come from? Why and how do we make distinctions of what constitutes “great” literature and what is just “pulp fiction”? Are such distinctions ever politically or culturally motivated? Can such distinctions become problematic in the sense that it causes us to overlook certain genres in favor of others?
- Also on page 129, Lloyd outlines the “reasons usually given for the inadequacy of the nineteenth-century Irish novel.” What are those reasons? You might want to take one of those reasons and analyze what sort of novels those conditions might produce. For instance, how might bilingualism and the emphasis on an oral culture affect the production of the Irish novel or novels from other cultures with similar circumstances?
- On page 131 Lloyd writes, “As a literary form, the novel is not simply the product and the reflection of certain social conditions but actively contributes to producing them as the very condition of its own reception.” What do you think Lloyd means by this statement?
- Oftentimes, in order to define something, we have to define it in the negative, or by what it is NOT. From what you’ve gathered from Lloyd’s essay, what characteristics do NOT define the Irish novel? Why is that the case? How is the Irish novel different from the English novel? Why is it different?
- Lloyd drops many, many key terms and historical references. Choose a key term or a historical reference and do a little research on your own to help better explain some of the important concepts in Lloyd’s essay. Some terms you might want to define are postcolonial, Irish nationalism, the realist novel, and the historical novel. Some historical references are Union, Young Ireland, the 1798 uprising, the Land League, and the Penal Laws. Once you’ve done a little research on your term or reference, explain how Lloyd uses it in his essay and how we can better understand his point through the small amount of research you’ve gathered. Make sure to cite your sources.

